A Theory of Relativity

In a discussion just a couple days ago with my best friend for life, he expressed his thoughts on the perfect balance of the Universe… that for every positive, there must also be a negative… for every outward there must also be an inward.  What troubled my friend was the appearance of an “outward,” “positive” side of manifested energy in the material world we can observe with our senses, and the fact there has never been a discussion or theory on the inverse, “negative” side of energy, or “anti-energy.”  This is not the notion of a “separate non-material “spritual” world” which exists apart from the physical, manifested creation, but a simultaneous presence of the “negative” side of conscious energy with the “positive” side we can observe.

This “theory of relativity” my friend and I developed, different from Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, is summed up in the following way: The total of what comprises the Universe – conscious energy, has two sides – one “positive” and one “negative.”  As the positive expands, the negative contracts and vice versa.  It is this play of forces which is responsible for the fact of relativity. Why is it even necessary to propose an “outward” and “inward” movement of concsious energy?  Because we know from scientists the Universe is continuing to expand.  The problem is, this expansion cannot continue indefinitely because the eternal expansion of the Universe, without retracting back onto itself would mean it had a “beginning,” which is impossible.  Why is a “beginning” impossible?  Because the only way a “beginning” can happen is if something comes out of nothing, which is a logical contradiction and an impossibility.  Everything has its origins in something which existed previously, and this “something” which previously has always been is consciousness and energy – or to put it another way – conscious energy, as consciousness is an aspect of energy, not something separate from it since All is One. 

What we call a “beginning” is actually nothing more than a change within a cycle. A cycle has no beginning and no end.  It only has change within it, such as the change of moving out, and moving back in, like breathing.  In this theory, the Universe is breathing just as we breathe, but the time it takes between change within its cycle – the “inhale” and “exhale” of the Universe, is incredibly long.  As far as scientists can tell, the Universe has been expanding indefinitely since the theoretical “big bang.”  It is likely that “big bang” occurred when the “inhale” of conscious energy finally came to that critical point of compression when it was forced back “out,” in the “exhale,” which we now observe as a seemingly ever-expanding Universe.  The only theory which makes sense, since an ever-expanding Universe, and a so-called “beginning” is impossible, is to propose the Universe, at some critical point within its “exhale,” will then be pulled back within itself  as the Universe contracts, and conscious energy eventually comes back to a critical point in its “inhale” at which point another “big bang” will take place.  Almost certainly, the expansion and contraction of the Universe has gone on forever and will continue to go on forever.  The “big bang” we theorize was responsible for our Universe as we know it was likely only one of countless “big bangs” throughout eternity.  The only way this “expansion” and “contraction” can take place is if there is a “positive” and “negative” side to conscious energy, like two sides of the same one coin…



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.